I'm thinking that the players would have to form our own version of the WM or UN. Only we would have to actually respond with some backbone to make it work... meaning the UN and WM deter war about as well as that kid at Tiannemen square stopped that Tank.
I have plenty of ideas on how to do this form of game...but lets hear y'alls...
A Pacifist's guide to WWIII
Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators
- Lightbringer
- General
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: May 23 2006
- Location: Texas
A Pacifist's guide to WWIII
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” -Winston Churchill
-
- Captain
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Oct 21 2005
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
- Lightbringer
- General
- Posts: 2973
- Joined: May 23 2006
- Location: Texas
Aye that's pretty much what I meant by forming our own UN. I just figured that having a set of rules, we should include what to do in case someone gets bored of "playing nice"
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” -Winston Churchill
-
- Captain
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Oct 21 2005
- Location: Fort Riley, Kansas
Well considering it's a World War scenario, I should expect war to happen. It's brutal things like massive civilian bombing, nukes, and breaking alliances that massive international pressure should bring.Lightbringer wrote:Aye that's pretty much what I meant by forming our own UN. I just figured that having a set of rules, we should include what to do in case someone gets bored of "playing nice"
Also, war withtout CB. But that's simulated in game, since war without sufficient CB raises all your neighbors' CB against you.