Battleships?
- przy
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 61
- Joined: May 13 2004
- Contact:
Battleships?
I know that in the timeframe of this game. No nation has them (except the U.S. maybe?) But I was wondering if they were in the game, just curious.
-
- Warrant Officer
- Posts: 36
- Joined: May 15 2005
- Location: Northern California
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
-
- Private
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Jul 24 2005
- Balthagor
- Supreme Ruler
- Posts: 22083
- Joined: Jun 04 2002
- Human: Yes
- Location: BattleGoat Studios
- bergsjaeger
- General
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Apr 22 2005
- Location: Woods Bend, Alabama,USA
U know there's a debate on the US battleships right now. Should they be recommissioned and updated? Actually they should. I mean think about it this way. All the US naval ships are thin skinned compared to the US Iowa and its sister ships. The US Iowa could possibly survive a hit from a anti-ship missle, depending where it is hit at. If they updated the battleships there is one plan to remove the rear gun so it could become like a landing platform for F-35 VTOl's. Even the area below the rear gun could become like an armored hangar. Also they plan to use a new kind of ammo (not sure what it is never could find out what it was). If they do recommission the battleships I hope they make the US Missouri and the US Alabama part of the program.
In war destroy everything even the livestock.
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Dec 29 2004
- Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England...
Just thought i'd mention something about them...
I got um as Europe lol
I will Rule the Waves with American Battleships
I got um as Europe lol
I will Rule the Waves with American Battleships
Supporting Nuclear Power in the UK.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
- bergsjaeger
- General
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Apr 22 2005
- Location: Woods Bend, Alabama,USA
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Dec 29 2004
- Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England...
It involved My Checkbook I can tell you that for a start...
And we did have battleships
We just sold them to Third World Countries after the War cus we were that poor
And we did have battleships
We just sold them to Third World Countries after the War cus we were that poor
Supporting Nuclear Power in the UK.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
- bergsjaeger
- General
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Apr 22 2005
- Location: Woods Bend, Alabama,USA
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Dec 29 2004
- Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England...
- bergsjaeger
- General
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Apr 22 2005
- Location: Woods Bend, Alabama,USA
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Dec 29 2004
- Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England...
We borrowed 100trillion Dollars off America at the end of WW2 and were still paying it back...
We can't afford to design new battleships anymore
We can't afford to design new battleships anymore
Supporting Nuclear Power in the UK.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
Just because the Japanese happened to build one near multiple fault lines doesn't make them any more dangerous than they were before the Earthquake.
- bergsjaeger
- General
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Apr 22 2005
- Location: Woods Bend, Alabama,USA
-
- Brigadier Gen.
- Posts: 896
- Joined: Dec 29 2004
- Location: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England...