Unit Errata

Place bug reports / questions here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

number47 wrote:Why are ZSU-23-4 Shilka (ID5310) and SA-3 Goa (ID5607) researchable by E region code (Europe, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Greece)??? HUH
I've seen that with update 3 you added E region code to a lot more units that didn't have it before and I would like to hear what was your reasoning (if it is not a problem) as some of them like those two mentioned were not historicaly built/researched by countries in E region code. :wink:
Shameless bump...
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

No need to bump, I don't always update the thread when I update the data. When I sit down with the database, I'll do a pass of the thread back to the last time I updated.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

Balthagor wrote:No need to bump, I don't always update the thread when I update the data. When I sit down with the database, I'll do a pass of the thread back to the last time I updated.
Since there was no comment to this particular post, I thought you overlooked it...
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Chesehead
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 637
Joined: Apr 19 2009

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Chesehead »

Balthagor wrote:missing should be posted elsewhere. This thread should be for errors of units that are in the game.
Sorry. I figured this was kind of the general unit threat. Any chance you can split it off and put it either here or in devolpment?
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

Chesehead wrote:
Balthagor wrote:missing should be posted elsewhere. This thread should be for errors of units that are in the game.
Sorry. I figured this was kind of the general unit threat. Any chance you can split it off and put it either here or in devolpment?
There is a thread just down the first page of this subforum called Missing units. :wink:
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

[_]O
Balth, unitID number 10220 is being used by two units, "Yak-28I Brewer-C" and "MiG-21R Fishbed-H Recce"...
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

number47 wrote:[_]O
Balth, unitID number 10220 is being used by two units, "Yak-28I Brewer-C" and "MiG-21R Fishbed-H Recce"...
Already reported, was found too late for fixing in udpate 3. Updated .unit file posted on the SupremeWiki
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
Col_Travis
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 691
Joined: Mar 09 2009
Location: CANZUK Intelligence Service

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Col_Travis »

I've found more than 2 dozen NATO aircraft that use combat radius for their range instead of their actual ranges and more than a dozen ground/naval units that use miles instead of kilometers for ranges.
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

okay, feel like making a list?
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
Col_Travis
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 691
Joined: Mar 09 2009
Location: CANZUK Intelligence Service

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Col_Travis »

Something like the 2020 Utilty would be really useful.
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

Balthagor wrote:okay, feel like making a list?
I have few that I run into while modding something...there are a lot of them but check these for start:

14215 CH-46A Sea Knight
14751 SA.330L Puma
14739 CH-46E Sea Knight
14742 CH-53D Sea Stallion
14748 UH-1N Huey
14751 SA.330L Puma
14754 Bo-105
14756 W-3A PZL Sokol
14757 AS.532UC Cougar
14759 CH-53E Super Stallion

These units are just few from many that don't use the same rule for speed (some use max, some cruise, some 80% of max), weight (some use empty weight, some loaded, some max takeoff), cargo (some use useful load, some difference between max takeoff and empty weight) and range (some use combat, some ferry, some max) :-?

I understand that it is an enormous amount of work but you should make it imperative to fix/balance the units database at least for new SR1936 if it is too late for SRCW...especially if you intend to make it possible to contiue playing SR1936 after the '45.
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

If this is true, than only RB version of Mig-25 (UnitID10246) should be high air unit since the others (UnitID 9176) had service ceiling below 70k...
So, MiG-25P (ID 9176) should be target type 4 (mid air) :wink:
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

UnitID 9196 "Mirage F1 CT" was F1C converted for ground attack roles...so I suggest moving it to class 10 (fighter/bomber) or class 11 (fighter/multi-role) and adjusting the ground attack stats... Or simply remove the "T" from "CT" :lol: :lol:
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2655
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: Unit Errata

Post by number47 »

A question to devs: is there any use of further posting corrections to this thread since you moved development to SR1936?
Do you even care for naming corrections?
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

It doesn't hurt to post as there is the possibility of carrying everything forward so long as data files don't change too much. Plus I still make corrections at times and post the updated default.unit file for the modders.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
Post Reply

Return to “Issues & Support”