3D modelling

Moderators: Balthagor, Legend, Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2619
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: 3D modelling

#856 Post by number47 » Jun 08 2018

They look great! Haven't tested the latest release yet but did I miss ZTZ99 (Type 99) release or is it still "in the works"?
Image
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr

Nerei
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 725
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: 3D modelling

#857 Post by Nerei » Jun 08 2018

The ZTZ99A2 is still what I would call "mostly textured". The same is true for the Merkava IV. The last collection of units where taken from what I had that where the furthest along (that and trying to finish off requests).

Chances are they will make it next time.

User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2619
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: 3D modelling

#858 Post by number47 » Jun 09 2018

Aha, ok thanks.

One more question, Kongo model you made and released a long time ago, was it the 1913 battlecruiser or the '90s destroyer?

EDIT: now I see you made both of them :lol: :lol: :lol: so it's ok, 1544 is picnum for battlecruiser
Image
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr

Nerei
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 725
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: 3D modelling

#859 Post by Nerei » Jun 09 2018

Yes and 1662 is the DDG. There appears to be some issue with the model being used for it.

Try using this one instead if you have issues.

download link

User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2619
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: 3D modelling

#860 Post by number47 » Jun 13 2018

Ok, I've run through fresh .units file from the latest 9.1.43 (I think, not sure if number correct) and applied all your additions where BG was still missing them and the only issue I found apart from minor model size variance that needs maybe little tweaking, was huge size variance with Rafale (reported long before, one 0 too much) and Type 214 sub which are noticeable too small compared to their counterparts. I'll probably fix them by my self soon and report the more appropriate sizes.

I made a cache with country having all your (Nerei made) units in reserve (edited orbat file) so I can easily compare them all and tweak the sizes but since you made so many of them, I'm reluctant to start :roll: :lol:

Oh, another question, do your "1789 Type XXI submarine" and "1550 Type A" refer to links I attached? I suspect the XXI is the one linked by I'm not sure on the Type A since there were a lot Type A units in IJN :D
Image
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr

Nerei
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 725
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: 3D modelling

#861 Post by Nerei » Jun 13 2018

The type XXI is indeed that german submarine (specifically Wilhelm Bauer/U-2540). The Type A though was a planned heavy cruiser design from the 6th Naval Armaments Supplement Programme or the 6th circle program (Maru 6 Keikaku). This was a 1942 programme that was scrapped with the start of the Pacific war and little actual reference exist for the vessel. How much existed in the first place is hard to say as construction was never started and a significant part of the design papers for imperial navy vessels where lost in the war (The perfect example of that is the A-150 design).
Personally I based it on a post-war book about the ship that included illustrations.

Image
The superstructure in this illustration has a lot in common with the Mogami class which makes sense given that the last imperial heavy cruiser design was the Ibuki class which was largely just a modified Mogami (before it was changed to an aircraft carrier that is).
It is an interesting design likely with high top speed and good firepower due to the 12 20cm 3rd year and 12 type 98 10cm dual purpose cannons. Like all Imperial navy cruisers it also has decent number of torpedo tubes. The placement of the Type 93 torpedoes in the stern hull is a bit problematic though if Chōkai is anything to go by.

Apparently it is also used in world of warships in some form but I have never played that game so all I can go from there is pictures.

Nerei
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 725
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: 3D modelling

#862 Post by Nerei » Jun 17 2018

I have been making a proper spreadsheet for the models I have been making so far.

It should include mesh ID, default textures, regional textures, status and the like. It have also tried to mention what the model depicts (with wikipedia link when applicable). I have yet to add what zip files each model is included in.

link

Note than the incomplete models listed are not exhaustive. It is a cut version of my main design spreadsheet with irrelevant information cut.

It should also be a good place report bugs, suggestions and the like as chances that I miss it there is far lower than in this topic given that it is well over 800 replies and growing.

Nerei
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 725
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: 3D modelling

#863 Post by Nerei » Jun 21 2018

Most of the work on the ZTZ-99A2 is now done.
Image
There is not that much different to see on the PRC version as the digital camouflage obscures them. It is mainly to ensure the default green vehicle is not just a green blob.

User avatar
number47
General
Posts: 2619
Joined: Sep 15 2011
Human: Yes
Location: X:913 Y:185

Re: 3D modelling

#864 Post by number47 » Jun 21 2018

Looks great!
Image
"If everyone is thinking alike, someone isn't thinking."
- General George Patton Jr

Post Reply

Return to “Modding SRUltimate”