Unit Errata

Place bug reports / questions here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Moderators

User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

GIJoe597 wrote:F4U-1 Corsair in the US list. History tells me it was carrier capable, (I miss Black Sheep Squadron). In game it is not. Should it be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vought_F4 ... r#Variants

Seems the F4U-1A was the first carrier capable.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
GIJoe597
Board Admin
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sep 29 2008
Human: Yes
Contact:

Re: Unit Errata

Post by GIJoe597 »

Apologies, I mistakenly thought the F4U was the base model and the F4U -1 was the carrier model in game. Lack of sleep.
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597


Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
Nerei
General
Posts: 1354
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Nerei »

vahadar wrote:

Code: Select all

17531, "DD-117 Takanami", 18, 142, 111, , , 6, 10, 4, 30, , J, ,
missing NumSquadInBatt value, should be 1
The correct choice would be to remove it entirely or rename a few units. The Takanami class is a reorder of the last 5 Murasame class destroyers and as such should not go further than the last ship of the series DD-114 Suzunami.
The followup class the 19DD or Akizuki class is already comple with 4 members and the first vessel of the followup to that the 25DD or Asahi class is fitting out.
There is not really any reason to go with the Takanami over Akizuki either as they fulfil the same role of Multipurpose destroyers. The Akizuki is just a more capable design.

So basically either remove the DD-117 Takanami or rename it to DD-115 Akizuki and the current DD-118 Akizuki to DD-118 Asahi.
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

Nerei wrote:...or rename it to DD-115 Akizuki and the current DD-118 Akizuki to DD-118 Asahi.
Okay.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
Nerei
General
Posts: 1354
Joined: Jan 11 2016
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Nerei »

Balthagor wrote:
Nerei wrote:...or rename it to DD-115 Akizuki and the current DD-118 Akizuki to DD-118 Asahi.
Okay.
Sorry I made a typing error the Asahi is DD-119 not DD-118. I have not checked stats but at least the names will be accurate.
I am currently unable to check but if memory serves me right it is currently using the Arleigh Burke mesh. You already have my Akizuki mesh (ID 1679) included if you want to use that instead. It will also work for Asahi as that is based on the Akizuki.
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

k, thanks
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
GIJoe597
Board Admin
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sep 29 2008
Human: Yes
Contact:

Re: Unit Errata

Post by GIJoe597 »

CGN-9 Long Beach

The Long Beach was the world's first nuclear-powered surface combatant. In game it has a range of over 1 million, but requires zero Uranium to build.
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597


Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
dax1
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 511
Joined: Apr 05 2012
Human: Yes
Location: Italy

Re: Unit Errata

Post by dax1 »

SGTscuba wrote:1914 sandbox, Italy has a duplicate capital ship called Espana with 2 different spellings and different stats but only a year build difference.

Spain has same thing in 1917 sandbox
yes...they are in default.unit file
17292, "España"
17468, "Espana"
Con forza ed ardimento
dax1
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 511
Joined: Apr 05 2012
Human: Yes
Location: Italy

Re: Unit Errata

Post by dax1 »

id 4239 "Canonne da 149/40 149mm Towed Gun" year 40 UGto 4240
id 4240 "Cannone da 149/35 149mm Towed Gun" year 0
maybe id 4240 need have UGTo 4239???

typing error (invert 2 letters)
id 20030 "AO Travisio Class" the real name is "AO Tarvisio Class"
id 13102 "Z.506 Arione" real name is "Z.506 Airone"
Con forza ed ardimento
Buzzbrad
General
Posts: 131
Joined: Oct 17 2013
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Buzzbrad »

dax1 wrote: May 01 2018 id 4239 "Canonne da 149/40 149mm Towed Gun" year 40 UGto 4240
id 4240 "Cannone da 149/35 149mm Towed Gun" year 0
maybe id 4240 need have UGTo 4239???

typing error (invert 2 letters)
id 20030 "AO Travisio Class" the real name is "AO Tarvisio Class"
id 13102 "Z.506 Arione" real name is "Z.506 Airone"
Thanks! Will be fixed with the next update
dax1
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 511
Joined: Apr 05 2012
Human: Yes
Location: Italy

Re: Unit Errata

Post by dax1 »

dax1 wrote: Dec 30 2017
SGTscuba wrote:1914 sandbox, Italy has a duplicate capital ship called Espana with 2 different spellings and different stats but only a year build difference.

Spain has same thing in 1917 sandbox
yes...they are in default.unit file
17292, "España"
17468, "Espana"
it's not yet fix!
Con forza ed ardimento
mrgenie
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 923
Joined: Jul 08 2008

Re: Unit Errata

Post by mrgenie »

Espana (can be build by France) is classified as Carrier

Looks like a battleship to me.. can't carry any planes and has for that time very strong attack values
[UI-MOD] All-In-One viewtopic.php?f=91&t=31906
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

mrgenie wrote: Apr 20 2020 Espana (can be build by France) is classified as Carrier

Looks like a battleship to me.. can't carry any planes and has for that time very strong attack values
Are you running .250 or 9.2.1? I think we fixed this with the new update.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
mrgenie
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 923
Joined: Jul 08 2008

Re: Unit Errata

Post by mrgenie »

Balthagor wrote: Apr 22 2020
mrgenie wrote: Apr 20 2020 Espana (can be build by France) is classified as Carrier

Looks like a battleship to me.. can't carry any planes and has for that time very strong attack values
Are you running .250 or 9.2.1? I think we fixed this with the new update.
.250

I just completely newly installed the whole computer from scratch so definitely running the latest
[UI-MOD] All-In-One viewtopic.php?f=91&t=31906
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

This appears to be fixed in 9.2.2. There is an insider build in beta currently.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
Post Reply

Return to “Issues and Support”