Unit Errata

Place bug reports / questions here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Moderators

vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

Code: Select all

17522, "O'Brien", 18, 682, 14, 42, , 6, 10, 5, 25, , M
This torpedo DD is actually from United States, designed and built there, UK never built or used it. Region code should be U then.
vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

Code: Select all

17531, "DD-117 Takanami", 18, 142, 111, , , 6, 10, 4, 30, , J, ,
missing NumSquadInBatt value, should be 1
way2co0l
Brigadier Gen.
Posts: 687
Joined: Nov 29 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by way2co0l »

Going to post speed Errata here rather than individual threads for each one. I am currently only looking through battleship and battlecruiser class ships and posting them here when the in game speed doesn't match what I find on wikipedia. Ships that do match will not be included, nor will I be including ships that are currently omitted from the game OOBs entirely, as I will be creating new threads for them and stating their speeds there instead.

I am beginning with the British OOB, and will be working on the Germans next. Once I finish with the major fleets, I may come back around to double check the smaller vessels, as well as going further into the interwar year ships.

Iron Duke class battleship-39km/h.
King George V class battleship-39km/h.
Orion class battleship-39km/h.
St Vincent class battleship-39km/h.
Bellerophon class battleship-39km/h.
King Edward VII class battleship-34km/h.
Majestic class battleship-30km/h.
Canopus class battleship-33km/h.
London class battleship-33km/h.
Duncan class battleship-35km/h.
Indefatigable class battlecruiser-48km/h.
Lion class battlecruiser-52km/h.
Queen Mary class battlecruiser-52km/h.
Tiger class battlecruiser-52km/h.
Courageous class battlecruiser-58km/h.
vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

way2co0l wrote:Going to post speed Errata here rather than individual threads for each one. I am currently only looking through battleship and battlecruiser class ships and posting them here when the in game speed doesn't match what I find on wikipedia. Ships that do match will not be included, nor will I be including ships that are currently omitted from the game OOBs entirely, as I will be creating new threads for them and stating their speeds there instead.

I am beginning with the British OOB, and will be working on the Germans next. Once I finish with the major fleets, I may come back around to double check the smaller vessels, as well as going further into the interwar year ships.
Check my mod for realistic range, all ships are already fixed there for speed and for all nations (source : navypedia and wikipedia) you can copy the stats and post here for SRGW. Double check if want, but there should be no mistake (btw in this mod when a class had different speed, i'm either taking the first ship of that class as model, or make an average speed between all speed variations, this is very true for english DDs class pre-1914)
Lion is more like 50-51kmh btw (27 or 27.5kts depending from sources) ;)
GIJoe597
Board Admin
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sep 29 2008
Human: Yes
Contact:

Re: Unit Errata

Post by GIJoe597 »

Ver 10.1.37

MTC MK II Infantry tank, Year 45; It has the country of origin listed as "W"

I think that should be United Kingdom or World wide.
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597


Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

14779, "CH-47F Chinook" has no tech prerequisite.
If i give one country all designs and techs in 1914, it is the only non-era design tradable to others.
vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

Legion Etrangere 57 is amphibious when others 85 and 111 versions arent. Should they all be amphibious? Would be nice ;)
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22083
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

GIJoe597 wrote:Ver 10.1.37

MTC MK II Infantry tank, Year 45; It has the country of origin listed as "W"

I think that should be United Kingdom or World wide.
W is the same as *, but updated for consistency. These are fictional.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22083
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Balthagor »

vahadar wrote:14779, "CH-47F Chinook" has no tech prerequisite.
Fixed.
vahadar wrote:Legion Etrangere 57 is amphibious when others 85 and 111 versions arent. Should they all be amphibious? Would be nice ;)
Not sure, Zuikaiku added those. He'd have to tell us what he intended.
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by Zuikaku »

Balthagor wrote: Not sure, Zuikaiku added those. He'd have to tell us what he intended.
I'll check that. Legion Etrangere 57 and all LE that follows are ment to be amphibious.

Also, all of the special forces are going to be rebalanced, they are somewhat too powerfull in areas they are not supposed to be.
Last edited by Zuikaku on Aug 30 2017, edited 1 time in total.
Please teach AI everything!
vahadar
Colonel
Posts: 257
Joined: May 19 2010
Human: Yes

Re: Unit Errata

Post by vahadar »

17463, "Aki" battleship is missing indirect firing ability (her sister class ship Satsuma id 17462 has)
GIJoe597
Board Admin
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sep 29 2008
Human: Yes
Contact:

Re: Unit Errata

Post by GIJoe597 »

Ver. 10.1.37

The B-17 Flying Fortress, the first one available, has a the following stats;
Fortification Attack = 30
Soft Attack= 19
Hard Attack= 23
Spotting = 20

The next version you can research/unlock is the B-17E, with the following stats;
Fortification =9
Soft = 14
Hard = 9
Spotting = 15


I believe these two are reversed. I think newer model should have the better damage and spotting?
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597


Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
GIJoe597
Board Admin
Posts: 2918
Joined: Sep 29 2008
Human: Yes
Contact:

Re: Unit Errata

Post by GIJoe597 »

F4U-1 Corsair in the US list. History tells me it was carrier capable, (I miss Black Sheep Squadron). In game it is not. Should it be?
https://www.youtube.com/user/GIJoe597


Older/retired gamers, who do not tolerate foolishness.
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USARG
SGTscuba
General
Posts: 2544
Joined: Dec 08 2007
Location: Tipton, UK

Re: Unit Errata

Post by SGTscuba »

GIJoe597 wrote:F4U-1 Corsair in the US list. History tells me it was carrier capable, (I miss Black Sheep Squadron). In game it is not. Should it be?
I thought the original one wasn't carrier capable, I think this was pointed out for SR36.
My SR:U Model Project, get the latest and post suggestions here:

http://www.bgforums.com/forums/viewtopi ... 79&t=28040
Post Reply

Return to “Issues and Support”