Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Place bug reports / questions here.

Moderators: Balthagor, Moderators

Post Reply
geminif4ucorsair
General
Posts: 1286
Joined: Jun 08 2005

Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Post by geminif4ucorsair »

The follow aircraft are primarily or all, fabric covered and should have have a pre-requisite of
Metal Alloy Airframes:

* CR.42 Falco (Italy, biplane)

* Bloch 150

* MS.406

* Gladiator Mk.I (UK, biplane)

* Kochyerigin Di-6 (Russia, biplane)

* I-153 (Russia, biplane)

* #9182 Hurricane I

* Fiesler Fi-167 (Germany)


ALL could use the tech: Aircraft 1936, however.

Thanks for considering. :-)
Last edited by geminif4ucorsair on Dec 06 2017, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Balthagor
Supreme Ruler
Posts: 22082
Joined: Jun 04 2002
Human: Yes
Location: BattleGoat Studios

Re: Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Post by Balthagor »

Anyone fell like pulling IDs for these units?

Thanks,
Chris Latour
BattleGoat Studios
chris@battlegoat.com
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Post by Zuikaku »

Should have or should not have?
Please teach AI everything!
geminif4ucorsair
General
Posts: 1286
Joined: Jun 08 2005

Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Post by geminif4ucorsair »

Zuikaku wrote:Should have or should not have?
Should NOT require All Metal Airframes tech.
User avatar
Zuikaku
General
Posts: 2394
Joined: Feb 10 2012
Human: Yes

Re: SRU / SRGW - Aircraft not qualified for Metal Alloy Airframes technology

Post by Zuikaku »

geminif4ucorsair wrote:
Zuikaku wrote:Should have or should not have?
Should NOT require All Metal Airframes tech.
I thought it was a mistake :wink:
Please teach AI everything!
Post Reply

Return to “Issues and Support”